![]() ![]() They traveled to another furry convention and recruited 206 participants to partake in their survey. While explicit attitudes influence our controlled behaviors, implicit attitudes are more subtle and influence our automatic, subconscious behaviors. The authors wanted to drill down more and look into explicit versus implicit identifications. It was clear that a therian identify significantly contributed to one’s concern for animal rights, with stronger self-identification leading to a stronger concern. 224 convention attendees were surveyed and all three hypotheses were supported. Third, therians’ concern for animal rights would be driven by how much they self-identify with nonhumans. Second, therians would show at least as much concern for animal rights as non-therian furries. ![]() For this one, the authors tested the validity of three hypotheses: first, therians would identify with nonhumans more than non-therian furries would. The first study was held at a furry convention in Texas. They embarked on a series of three studies to try and come up with an answer. The potential overlap in these two groups is clear, but in this study, the authors sought to see how these two groups’ identification with nonhumans manifested in their moral concern for animals’ rights and wellbeing. Therians identify more closely with specific species than with anthropomorphized animals in general. One of these individuals, for example, might identify as feeling like they have a cat soul but are trapped in a human body. On the other hand, therians identify as nonhuman animals in a metaphysical way and don’t necessarily enjoy anthropomorphic media. Many furries have fursonas, or personalized avatars that represent oneself – usually as an anthropomorphized nonhuman. Furries are a group of people who enjoy media featuring anthropomorphized animals and have created communities centered around that. There are two groups who indeed identify with nonhuman animals: furries and therians. In turn, researchers have started to wonder if the inverse is true: if a human incorporates nonhuman elements into their own self-concept, are they more likely to be concerned with the well-being of nonhumans? If we incorporate a human element into our perception of an animal, social identity theory says we will care more about their wellbeing. These mascots are an example of anthropomorphism, or the assignment of human characteristics to nonhumans including objects, plants, and animals.Īs humans, we tend to treat those we identify as being more similar to us better. Was your school team represented by the mascot? If so, odds are that this mascot was some type of animal donning clothes and walking around on two legs. Think back to your days in school, be it high school or earlier.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |